Finland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre

Finland
0.6021 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.629 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Finland rank
166th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
163rd

Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Finland
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.629 units per square kilometre against 0.6021 units per square kilometre in Finland, a difference of 0.0269 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Finland ahead.

Finland ranks 166th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3783 units per square kilometre 0.1152 units per square kilometre 0.2631 units per square kilometre Finland
1970s 0.4302 units per square kilometre 0.1669 units per square kilometre 0.2633 units per square kilometre Finland
1980s 0.4366 units per square kilometre 0.2212 units per square kilometre 0.2154 units per square kilometre Finland
1990s 0.4314 units per square kilometre 0.2694 units per square kilometre 0.1621 units per square kilometre Finland
2000s 0.5078 units per square kilometre 0.3593 units per square kilometre 0.1484 units per square kilometre Finland
2010s 0.6374 units per square kilometre 0.5418 units per square kilometre 0.0956 units per square kilometre Finland
2020s 0.599 units per square kilometre 0.6245 units per square kilometre 0.0256 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, Finland or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.629 units per square kilometre against 0.6021 units per square kilometre in Finland as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between Finland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0269 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Finland and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
Finland ranks 166th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Finland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/finland/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/finland/tanzania/">Finland vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.