Costa Rica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre

Costa Rica
2.72 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sao Tome and Principe
2.66 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Costa Rica rank
88th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
91st

Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Sao Tome and Principe
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 2.72 units per square kilometre against 2.66 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 0.06 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Sao Tome and Principe ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 91st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Sao Tome and Principe in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2845 units per square kilometre 0.8531 units per square kilometre 0.5686 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1970s 0.4066 units per square kilometre 1.03 units per square kilometre 0.6254 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1980s 0.5747 units per square kilometre 1.26 units per square kilometre 0.682 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
1990s 0.8523 units per square kilometre 1.45 units per square kilometre 0.5953 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2000s 1.22 units per square kilometre 1.42 units per square kilometre 0.1953 units per square kilometre Sao Tome and Principe
2010s 1.93 units per square kilometre 1.73 units per square kilometre 0.1989 units per square kilometre Costa Rica
2020s 2.59 units per square kilometre 2.45 units per square kilometre 0.1379 units per square kilometre Costa Rica

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, Costa Rica or Sao Tome and Principe?
Costa Rica, at 2.72 units per square kilometre against 2.66 units per square kilometre in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between Costa Rica and Sao Tome and Principe?
0.06 units per square kilometre, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Sao Tome and Principe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Costa Rica and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
Costa Rica ranks 88th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 91st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Costa Rica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/costa-rica/sao-tome-and-principe/">Costa Rica vs Sao Tome and Principe: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.