Central Europe and the Baltics vs Gibraltar: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
2.95 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar
114.2 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
7th
Gibraltar rank
5th

Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Gibraltar
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 114.2 units per square kilometre against 2.95 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 111.25 units per square kilometre.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 38.7 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Gibraltar has been ahead every year.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th and Gibraltar ranks 5th of 43 groups.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Gibraltar Difference Ahead
1960s 3.27 units per square kilometre 57.78 units per square kilometre 54.51 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1970s 3.42 units per square kilometre 66.18 units per square kilometre 62.76 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 3.8 units per square kilometre 72.17 units per square kilometre 68.37 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 3.14 units per square kilometre 64.56 units per square kilometre 61.42 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2000s 2.64 units per square kilometre 73.9 units per square kilometre 71.26 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2010s 3.36 units per square kilometre 93.92 units per square kilometre 90.56 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2020s 3.1 units per square kilometre 109.78 units per square kilometre 106.67 units per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Gibraltar?
Gibraltar, at 114.2 units per square kilometre against 2.95 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Gibraltar?
111.25 units per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Gibraltar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Gibraltar rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 7th and Gibraltar ranks 5th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Gibraltar: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/gibraltar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/gibraltar/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Gibraltar: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.