Central African Republic vs Suriname: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.0756 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Suriname
0.0844 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
210th
Suriname rank
208th

Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Suriname
0.020.040.060.08196119922023

How they compare

Suriname currently reports 0.0844 units per square kilometre against 0.0756 units per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0088 units per square kilometre.

That makes Suriname's figure about 1.1 times Central African Republic's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 210th and Suriname ranks 208th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 5 and Suriname in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Suriname Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0392 units per square kilometre 0.0206 units per square kilometre 0.0186 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1970s 0.0429 units per square kilometre 0.0216 units per square kilometre 0.0213 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 0.0347 units per square kilometre 0.0239 units per square kilometre 0.0109 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1990s 0.0334 units per square kilometre 0.0305 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2000s 0.0427 units per square kilometre 0.0437 units per square kilometre 0.0009 units per square kilometre Suriname
2010s 0.0637 units per square kilometre 0.0607 units per square kilometre 0.0029 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0.0759 units per square kilometre 0.0799 units per square kilometre 0.004 units per square kilometre Suriname

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Suriname?
Suriname, at 0.0844 units per square kilometre against 0.0756 units per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Suriname?
0.0088 units per square kilometre, with Suriname ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Suriname?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Suriname rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 210th and Suriname ranks 208th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Suriname: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/suriname/">Central African Republic vs Suriname: Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 60-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.