Early-demographic dividend vs South Sudan: Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate

Early-demographic dividend
2.8 % change on previous year
in 2025
South Sudan
4.81 % change on previous year
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
23rd
South Sudan rank
24th

Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • South Sudan
-20246196119932025

How they compare

South Sudan currently reports 4.81 % change on previous year against 2.8 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 2.01 % change on previous year.

That makes South Sudan's figure about 1.7 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 23rd and South Sudan ranks 24th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 4 and South Sudan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend South Sudan Difference Ahead
1960s 2.69 % change on previous year 1.6 % change on previous year 1.09 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
1970s 2.24 % change on previous year 2.42 % change on previous year 0.1865 % change on previous year South Sudan
1980s 2.87 % change on previous year 1.29 % change on previous year 1.57 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
1990s 2.74 % change on previous year 1.55 % change on previous year 1.18 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2000s 2.31 % change on previous year 3.93 % change on previous year 1.62 % change on previous year South Sudan
2010s 4.13 % change on previous year 2.74 % change on previous year 1.39 % change on previous year Early-demographic dividend
2020s 2.83 % change on previous year 5.37 % change on previous year 2.54 % change on previous year South Sudan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate, Early-demographic dividend or South Sudan?
South Sudan, at 4.81 % change on previous year against 2.8 % change on previous year in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate between Early-demographic dividend and South Sudan?
2.01 % change on previous year, with South Sudan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and South Sudan?
65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and South Sudan rank globally for population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 23rd and South Sudan ranks 24th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs South Sudan: Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/south-sudan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-60-64-female-annual-growth-rate/early-demographic-dividend/south-sudan/">Early-demographic dividend vs South Sudan: Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 60-64, female, annual growth rate
Unit
% change on previous year
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,000 data points, 1961–2025
Last refreshed

The year-on-year percentage change in Population ages 60-64, female. Computed from consecutive annual observations; years either side of a gap are skipped rather than bridged.