Samoa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre
Samoa
1.57 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.59 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Samoa rank
123rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
122nd
Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre over time
- Samoa
- Turks and Caicos Islands
How they compare
Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.59 units per square kilometre against 1.57 units per square kilometre in Samoa, a difference of 0.02 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Samoa ahead.
Samoa ranks 123rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 122nd of 216 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Samoa averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Samoa | Turks and Caicos Islands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.4191 units per square kilometre | 0.0861 units per square kilometre | 0.333 units per square kilometre | Samoa |
| 1970s | 0.5781 units per square kilometre | 0.1092 units per square kilometre | 0.469 units per square kilometre | Samoa |
| 1980s | 0.7664 units per square kilometre | 0.1184 units per square kilometre | 0.6479 units per square kilometre | Samoa |
| 1990s | 0.77 units per square kilometre | 0.2064 units per square kilometre | 0.5635 units per square kilometre | Samoa |
| 2000s | 0.853 units per square kilometre | 0.4529 units per square kilometre | 0.4 units per square kilometre | Samoa |
| 2010s | 1.23 units per square kilometre | 1.04 units per square kilometre | 0.191 units per square kilometre | Samoa |
| 2020s | 1.51 units per square kilometre | 1.53 units per square kilometre | 0.0127 units per square kilometre | Turks and Caicos Islands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre, Samoa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
- Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.59 units per square kilometre against 1.57 units per square kilometre in Samoa as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre between Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 0.02 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Samoa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre?
- Samoa ranks 123rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 122nd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 55-59, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.