Nauru vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre
Nauru
9.2 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.5889 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru rank
36th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
37th
Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre over time
- Nauru
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Nauru currently reports 9.2 units per square kilometre against 0.5889 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 8.61 units per square kilometre.
That makes Nauru's figure about 15.6 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Nauru has been ahead every year.
Nauru ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 216 countries.
Nauru has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Nauru | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.59 units per square kilometre | 0.1533 units per square kilometre | 3.44 units per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 1970s | 9.76 units per square kilometre | 0.1934 units per square kilometre | 9.57 units per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 1980s | 7.52 units per square kilometre | 0.2442 units per square kilometre | 7.27 units per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 1990s | 6.71 units per square kilometre | 0.291 units per square kilometre | 6.42 units per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 2000s | 5.37 units per square kilometre | 0.362 units per square kilometre | 5 units per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 2010s | 7 units per square kilometre | 0.4497 units per square kilometre | 6.56 units per square kilometre | Nauru |
| 2020s | 8.6 units per square kilometre | 0.5606 units per square kilometre | 8.04 units per square kilometre | Nauru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre, Nauru or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Nauru, at 9.2 units per square kilometre against 0.5889 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre between Nauru and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 8.61 units per square kilometre, with Nauru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Nauru and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Nauru and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre?
- Nauru ranks 36th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 37th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 55-59, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.