Guam vs Nauru: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre

Guam
9.25 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Nauru
9.2 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
34th
Nauru rank
36th

Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Guam
  • Nauru
2.557.51012.5196119922023

How they compare

Guam currently reports 9.25 units per square kilometre against 9.2 units per square kilometre in Nauru, a difference of 0.05 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nauru ahead.

Guam ranks 34th and Nauru ranks 36th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guam averaged higher in 3 and Nauru in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guam Nauru Difference Ahead
1960s 1.59 units per square kilometre 3.59 units per square kilometre 2 units per square kilometre Nauru
1970s 2.33 units per square kilometre 9.76 units per square kilometre 7.43 units per square kilometre Nauru
1980s 3.77 units per square kilometre 7.52 units per square kilometre 3.74 units per square kilometre Nauru
1990s 4.41 units per square kilometre 6.71 units per square kilometre 2.3 units per square kilometre Nauru
2000s 6.27 units per square kilometre 5.37 units per square kilometre 0.9011 units per square kilometre Guam
2010s 8.31 units per square kilometre 7 units per square kilometre 1.31 units per square kilometre Guam
2020s 9.32 units per square kilometre 8.6 units per square kilometre 0.7236 units per square kilometre Guam

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre, Guam or Nauru?
Guam, at 9.25 units per square kilometre against 9.2 units per square kilometre in Nauru as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre between Guam and Nauru?
0.05 units per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Nauru?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guam and Nauru rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre?
Guam ranks 34th and Nauru ranks 36th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guam vs Nauru: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-square-kilometre/guam/naoero/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-square-kilometre/guam/naoero/">Guam vs Nauru: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.