Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre

Cote d'Ivoire
1.15 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Equatorial Guinea
1.08 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Cote d'Ivoire rank
146th
Equatorial Guinea rank
148th

Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Equatorial Guinea
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 1.15 units per square kilometre against 1.08 units per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.07 units per square kilometre.

That makes Cote d'Ivoire's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 146th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 6 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Equatorial Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1624 units per square kilometre 0.1627 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Equatorial Guinea
1970s 0.2489 units per square kilometre 0.1497 units per square kilometre 0.0993 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1980s 0.3518 units per square kilometre 0.1643 units per square kilometre 0.1874 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
1990s 0.4566 units per square kilometre 0.2238 units per square kilometre 0.2328 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2000s 0.5145 units per square kilometre 0.3851 units per square kilometre 0.1294 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2010s 0.8246 units per square kilometre 0.7161 units per square kilometre 0.1084 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 1.08 units per square kilometre 1.03 units per square kilometre 0.0525 units per square kilometre Cote d'Ivoire

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre, Cote d'Ivoire or Equatorial Guinea?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 1.15 units per square kilometre against 1.08 units per square kilometre in Equatorial Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre between Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
0.07 units per square kilometre, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 146th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 148th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-square-kilometre/cote-d-ivoire/equatorial-guinea/">Cote d'Ivoire vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.