Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.6817 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.6965 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
165th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
163rd

Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.6196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.6965 units per square kilometre against 0.6817 units per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0148 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Brazil ranks 165th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Brazil averaged higher in 2 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1223 units per square kilometre 0.1328 units per square kilometre 0.0105 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 0.1588 units per square kilometre 0.1945 units per square kilometre 0.0357 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 0.2185 units per square kilometre 0.2605 units per square kilometre 0.042 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0.2818 units per square kilometre 0.3424 units per square kilometre 0.0606 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.3937 units per square kilometre 0.4629 units per square kilometre 0.0692 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.5742 units per square kilometre 0.499 units per square kilometre 0.0752 units per square kilometre Brazil
2020s 0.6741 units per square kilometre 0.6346 units per square kilometre 0.0395 units per square kilometre Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre, Brazil or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.6965 units per square kilometre against 0.6817 units per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre between Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0148 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 165th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 163rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tanzania/">Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.