Post-demographic dividend vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Population ages 55-59, male, per capita

Post-demographic dividend
0.0335 units per person
in 2025
Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0.0407 units per person
in 2025
Post-demographic dividend rank
7th
Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank
8th

Population ages 55-59, male, per capita over time

  • Post-demographic dividend
  • Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Sint Maarten (Dutch part) currently reports 0.0407 units per person against 0.0335 units per person in Post-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0072 units per person.

That makes Sint Maarten (Dutch part)'s figure about 1.2 times Post-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Post-demographic dividend ahead.

Post-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 8th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Post-demographic dividend averaged higher in 5 and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Post-demographic dividend Sint Maarten (Dutch part) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0239 units per person 0.0161 units per person 0.0079 units per person Post-demographic dividend
1970s 0.0216 units per person 0.012 units per person 0.0096 units per person Post-demographic dividend
1980s 0.0249 units per person 0.0084 units per person 0.0165 units per person Post-demographic dividend
1990s 0.0255 units per person 0.0114 units per person 0.0142 units per person Post-demographic dividend
2000s 0.0294 units per person 0.0227 units per person 0.0067 units per person Post-demographic dividend
2010s 0.0327 units per person 0.0341 units per person 0.0014 units per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)
2020s 0.0339 units per person 0.0424 units per person 0.0085 units per person Sint Maarten (Dutch part)

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per capita, Post-demographic dividend or Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
Sint Maarten (Dutch part), at 0.0407 units per person against 0.0335 units per person in Post-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per capita between Post-demographic dividend and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
0.0072 units per person, with Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Post-demographic dividend and Sint Maarten (Dutch part)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Post-demographic dividend and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per capita?
Post-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Sint Maarten (Dutch part) ranks 8th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Post-demographic dividend vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Population ages 55-59, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-capita/post-demographic-dividend/sint-maarten-dutch-part/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-capita/post-demographic-dividend/sint-maarten-dutch-part/">Post-demographic dividend vs Sint Maarten (Dutch part): Population ages 55-59, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.