Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 55-59, male, per capita

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
0.011 units per person
in 2025
Hong Kong, China
0.0325 units per person
in 2025
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
42nd
Hong Kong, China rank
43rd

Population ages 55-59, male, per capita over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Hong Kong, China
0.010.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 0.0325 units per person against 0.011 units per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 0.0215 units per person.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 3.0 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ahead.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd of 43 groups.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Hong Kong, China Difference Ahead
1960s 0.012 units per person 0.012 units per person 0.0001 units per person Hong Kong, China
1970s 0.0116 units per person 0.0202 units per person 0.0086 units per person Hong Kong, China
1980s 0.0108 units per person 0.023 units per person 0.0122 units per person Hong Kong, China
1990s 0.01 units per person 0.0222 units per person 0.0122 units per person Hong Kong, China
2000s 0.0098 units per person 0.0268 units per person 0.017 units per person Hong Kong, China
2010s 0.01 units per person 0.0387 units per person 0.0286 units per person Hong Kong, China
2020s 0.0107 units per person 0.0356 units per person 0.0249 units per person Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per capita, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Hong Kong, China?
Hong Kong, China, at 0.0325 units per person against 0.011 units per person in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per capita between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
0.0215 units per person, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Hong Kong, China rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per capita?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 42nd and Hong Kong, China ranks 43rd of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 55-59, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-capita/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/hong-kong-sar-china/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Hong Kong, China: Population ages 55-59, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.