East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Greenland: Population ages 55-59, male, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0358 units per person
in 2025
Greenland
0.0415 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
2nd
Greenland rank
5th

Population ages 55-59, male, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Greenland
0.010.020.030.040.05196019922025

How they compare

Greenland currently reports 0.0415 units per person against 0.0358 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0057 units per person.

That makes Greenland's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Greenland ranks 5th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and Greenland in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Greenland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0149 units per person 0.0109 units per person 0.0039 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.0143 units per person 0.0121 units per person 0.0022 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0.0157 units per person 0.0169 units per person 0.0013 units per person Greenland
1990s 0.0169 units per person 0.0216 units per person 0.0047 units per person Greenland
2000s 0.0202 units per person 0.0287 units per person 0.0085 units per person Greenland
2010s 0.0262 units per person 0.0383 units per person 0.0121 units per person Greenland
2020s 0.034 units per person 0.044 units per person 0.01 units per person Greenland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, male, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Greenland?
Greenland, at 0.0415 units per person against 0.0358 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, male, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Greenland?
0.0057 units per person, with Greenland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Greenland?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Greenland rank globally for population ages 55-59, male, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 2nd and Greenland ranks 5th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Greenland: Population ages 55-59, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/greenland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/greenland/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Greenland: Population ages 55-59, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.