Guam vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre
Guam
9.04 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0.6471 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guam rank
38th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
35th
Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre over time
- Guam
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Guam currently reports 9.04 units per square kilometre against 0.6471 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 8.39 units per square kilometre.
That makes Guam's figure about 14.0 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Guam has been ahead every year.
Guam ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 216 countries.
Guam has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guam | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.16 units per square kilometre | 0.1648 units per square kilometre | 0.9963 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1970s | 1.81 units per square kilometre | 0.2084 units per square kilometre | 1.6 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1980s | 3.12 units per square kilometre | 0.2668 units per square kilometre | 2.85 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 1990s | 4.27 units per square kilometre | 0.3233 units per square kilometre | 3.95 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2000s | 6.23 units per square kilometre | 0.4006 units per square kilometre | 5.83 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2010s | 8.12 units per square kilometre | 0.5056 units per square kilometre | 7.62 units per square kilometre | Guam |
| 2020s | 9.01 units per square kilometre | 0.6196 units per square kilometre | 8.39 units per square kilometre | Guam |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre, Guam or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Guam, at 9.04 units per square kilometre against 0.6471 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre between Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 8.39 units per square kilometre, with Guam ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Guam and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre?
- Guam ranks 38th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 35th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 55-59, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.