Eswatini vs United States of America: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre

Eswatini
1.13 units per square kilometre
in 2023
United States of America
1.13 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Eswatini rank
147th
United States of America rank
148th

Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Eswatini
  • United States of America
0.20.40.60.811.2196119922023

How they compare

Eswatini currently reports 1.13 units per square kilometre against 1.13 units per square kilometre in United States of America, a difference of 0 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was United States of America ahead.

Eswatini ranks 147th and United States of America ranks 148th of 216 countries.

United States of America has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Eswatini United States of America Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2876 units per square kilometre 0.5223 units per square kilometre 0.2348 units per square kilometre United States of America
1970s 0.3492 units per square kilometre 0.6131 units per square kilometre 0.2639 units per square kilometre United States of America
1980s 0.3912 units per square kilometre 0.64 units per square kilometre 0.2488 units per square kilometre United States of America
1990s 0.5149 units per square kilometre 0.6418 units per square kilometre 0.1269 units per square kilometre United States of America
2000s 0.7192 units per square kilometre 0.9267 units per square kilometre 0.2075 units per square kilometre United States of America
2010s 0.9024 units per square kilometre 1.17 units per square kilometre 0.2693 units per square kilometre United States of America
2020s 1.08 units per square kilometre 1.16 units per square kilometre 0.0725 units per square kilometre United States of America

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre, Eswatini or United States of America?
Eswatini, at 1.13 units per square kilometre against 1.13 units per square kilometre in United States of America as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre between Eswatini and United States of America?
0 units per square kilometre, with Eswatini ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and United States of America?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Eswatini and United States of America rank globally for population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre?
Eswatini ranks 147th and United States of America ranks 148th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Eswatini vs United States of America: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/united-states/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/eswatini/united-states/">Eswatini vs United States of America: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.