Democratic Republic of Congo vs Norway: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre

Democratic Republic of Congo
0.5377 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Norway
0.4833 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Democratic Republic of Congo rank
175th
Norway rank
176th

Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Democratic Republic of Congo
  • Norway
0.10.20.30.40.5196119922023

How they compare

Democratic Republic of Congo currently reports 0.5377 units per square kilometre against 0.4833 units per square kilometre in Norway, a difference of 0.0544 units per square kilometre.

That makes Democratic Republic of Congo's figure about 1.1 times Norway's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.

Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th and Norway ranks 176th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Democratic Republic of Congo averaged higher in 1 and Norway in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Democratic Republic of Congo Norway Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1038 units per square kilometre 0.3039 units per square kilometre 0.2001 units per square kilometre Norway
1970s 0.1322 units per square kilometre 0.3319 units per square kilometre 0.1996 units per square kilometre Norway
1980s 0.1749 units per square kilometre 0.2954 units per square kilometre 0.1206 units per square kilometre Norway
1990s 0.2404 units per square kilometre 0.2683 units per square kilometre 0.0278 units per square kilometre Norway
2000s 0.3142 units per square kilometre 0.3843 units per square kilometre 0.0701 units per square kilometre Norway
2010s 0.4116 units per square kilometre 0.4227 units per square kilometre 0.0111 units per square kilometre Norway
2020s 0.5144 units per square kilometre 0.4664 units per square kilometre 0.048 units per square kilometre Democratic Republic of Congo

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre, Democratic Republic of Congo or Norway?
Democratic Republic of Congo, at 0.5377 units per square kilometre against 0.4833 units per square kilometre in Norway as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre between Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway?
0.0544 units per square kilometre, with Democratic Republic of Congo ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Democratic Republic of Congo and Norway rank globally for population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre?
Democratic Republic of Congo ranks 175th and Norway ranks 176th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Democratic Republic of Congo vs Norway: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/norway/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/congo-dem-rep/norway/">Democratic Republic of Congo vs Norway: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.