Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre

Chile
0.8114 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.7693 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Chile rank
161st
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
164th

Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Chile
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.8114 units per square kilometre against 0.7693 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.0421 units per square kilometre.

That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Chile ahead.

Chile ranks 161st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 164th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1785 units per square kilometre 0.1494 units per square kilometre 0.0291 units per square kilometre Chile
1970s 0.2257 units per square kilometre 0.2065 units per square kilometre 0.0192 units per square kilometre Chile
1980s 0.3218 units per square kilometre 0.2727 units per square kilometre 0.0491 units per square kilometre Chile
1990s 0.3596 units per square kilometre 0.3379 units per square kilometre 0.0217 units per square kilometre Chile
2000s 0.4933 units per square kilometre 0.5063 units per square kilometre 0.013 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.6877 units per square kilometre 0.6618 units per square kilometre 0.0258 units per square kilometre Chile
2020s 0.7952 units per square kilometre 0.7305 units per square kilometre 0.0647 units per square kilometre Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre, Chile or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Chile, at 0.8114 units per square kilometre against 0.7693 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre between Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0421 units per square kilometre, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Chile and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre?
Chile ranks 161st and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 164th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/chile/tanzania/">Chile vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.