Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre

Brazil
0.7377 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
0.7693 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Brazil rank
166th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
164th

Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Brazil
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
0.20.40.60.8196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 0.7693 units per square kilometre against 0.7377 units per square kilometre in Brazil, a difference of 0.0316 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.

Brazil ranks 166th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 164th of 216 countries.

Tanzania, United Republic of has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.1214 units per square kilometre 0.1494 units per square kilometre 0.028 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1970s 0.1659 units per square kilometre 0.2065 units per square kilometre 0.0406 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1980s 0.2437 units per square kilometre 0.2727 units per square kilometre 0.029 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0.3014 units per square kilometre 0.3379 units per square kilometre 0.0365 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2000s 0.4199 units per square kilometre 0.5063 units per square kilometre 0.0864 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2010s 0.6203 units per square kilometre 0.6618 units per square kilometre 0.0415 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
2020s 0.7289 units per square kilometre 0.7305 units per square kilometre 0.0016 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre, Brazil or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 0.7693 units per square kilometre against 0.7377 units per square kilometre in Brazil as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre between Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.0316 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Brazil and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre?
Brazil ranks 166th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 164th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-55-59-female-per-square-kilometre/brazil/tanzania/">Brazil vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 55-59, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 55-59, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.