China vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Population ages 50-54, male, per capita

China
0.041 units per person
in 2025
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.0299 units per person
in 2025
China rank
11th
Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank
14th

Population ages 50-54, male, per capita over time

  • China
  • Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
0.020.030.04196019922025

How they compare

China currently reports 0.041 units per person against 0.0299 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries), a difference of 0.0111 units per person.

That makes China's figure about 1.4 times Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)'s.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ahead.

China ranks 11th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 14th of 218 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0191 units per person 0.0194 units per person 0.0003 units per person Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1970s 0.0184 units per person 0.0203 units per person 0.002 units per person Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1980s 0.0203 units per person 0.0266 units per person 0.0063 units per person Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
1990s 0.0205 units per person 0.0222 units per person 0.0018 units per person Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)
2000s 0.0299 units per person 0.0291 units per person 0.0008 units per person China
2010s 0.0346 units per person 0.031 units per person 0.0036 units per person China
2020s 0.0426 units per person 0.0293 units per person 0.0133 units per person China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 50-54, male, per capita, China or Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
China, at 0.041 units per person against 0.0299 units per person in Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 50-54, male, per capita between China and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
0.0111 units per person, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries)?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do China and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) rank globally for population ages 50-54, male, per capita?
China ranks 11th and Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries) ranks 14th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 50-54, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Population ages 50-54, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-50-54-male-per-capita/china/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-50-54-male-per-capita/china/europe-and-central-asia-ida-and-ibrd-countries/">China vs Europe & Central Asia (IDA & IBRD countries): Population ages 50-54, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 50-54, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 50-54, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.