Central African Republic vs Iceland: Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre

Central African Republic
0.1048 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Iceland
0.1085 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central African Republic rank
211th
Iceland rank
209th

Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Central African Republic
  • Iceland
0.040.060.080.10.12196119922023

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.1085 units per square kilometre against 0.1048 units per square kilometre in Central African Republic, a difference of 0.0037 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central African Republic ahead.

Central African Republic ranks 211th and Iceland ranks 209th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central African Republic averaged higher in 5 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central African Republic Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0555 units per square kilometre 0.0427 units per square kilometre 0.0127 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1970s 0.0617 units per square kilometre 0.0493 units per square kilometre 0.0124 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
1980s 0.0514 units per square kilometre 0.054 units per square kilometre 0.0026 units per square kilometre Iceland
1990s 0.0573 units per square kilometre 0.0615 units per square kilometre 0.0043 units per square kilometre Iceland
2000s 0.096 units per square kilometre 0.0899 units per square kilometre 0.0061 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2010s 0.114 units per square kilometre 0.108 units per square kilometre 0.006 units per square kilometre Central African Republic
2020s 0.1096 units per square kilometre 0.1066 units per square kilometre 0.003 units per square kilometre Central African Republic

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre, Central African Republic or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.1085 units per square kilometre against 0.1048 units per square kilometre in Central African Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre between Central African Republic and Iceland?
0.0037 units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Iceland?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central African Republic and Iceland rank globally for population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre?
Central African Republic ranks 211th and Iceland ranks 209th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central African Republic vs Iceland: Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-50-54-female-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-50-54-female-per-square-kilometre/central-african-republic/iceland/">Central African Republic vs Iceland: Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 50-54, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.