Belgium vs Curaçao: Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre
Belgium
12.83 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Curaçao
12.71 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
24th
Curaçao rank
25th
Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre over time
- Belgium
- Curaçao
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 12.83 units per square kilometre against 12.71 units per square kilometre in Curaçao, a difference of 0.12 units per square kilometre.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 13 shared years of data; in 2011 it was Curaçao ahead.
Belgium ranks 24th and Curaçao ranks 25th of 216 countries.
Curaçao has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Curaçao | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 13.17 units per square kilometre | 15.61 units per square kilometre | 2.45 units per square kilometre | Curaçao |
| 2020s | 12.78 units per square kilometre | 12.99 units per square kilometre | 0.2136 units per square kilometre | Curaçao |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre, Belgium or Curaçao?
- Belgium, at 12.83 units per square kilometre against 12.71 units per square kilometre in Curaçao as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre between Belgium and Curaçao?
- 0.12 units per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Curaçao?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2011 to 2023.
- How do Belgium and Curaçao rank globally for population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre?
- Belgium ranks 24th and Curaçao ranks 25th of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 50-54, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 50-54, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.