East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Macao: Population ages 45-49, female, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0321 units per person
in 2025
Macao
0.0381 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
18th
Macao rank
19th

Population ages 45-49, female, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Macao
0.010.020.030.040.05196019922025

How they compare

Macao currently reports 0.0381 units per person against 0.0321 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.006 units per person.

That makes Macao's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Macao ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 18th and Macao ranks 19th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 2 and Macao in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Macao Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0214 units per person 0.0219 units per person 0.0005 units per person Macao
1970s 0.0206 units per person 0.0191 units per person 0.0015 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1980s 0.0208 units per person 0.0166 units per person 0.0043 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1990s 0.0238 units per person 0.024 units per person 0.0002 units per person Macao
2000s 0.0306 units per person 0.0454 units per person 0.0148 units per person Macao
2010s 0.0387 units per person 0.0459 units per person 0.0072 units per person Macao
2020s 0.0343 units per person 0.0406 units per person 0.0062 units per person Macao

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 45-49, female, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Macao?
Macao, at 0.0381 units per person against 0.0321 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 45-49, female, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Macao?
0.006 units per person, with Macao ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Macao?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Macao rank globally for population ages 45-49, female, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 18th and Macao ranks 19th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 45-49, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Macao: Population ages 45-49, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 10 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-45-49-female-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/macao-sar-china/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-45-49-female-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/macao-sar-china/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Macao: Population ages 45-49, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 45-49, female, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 45-49, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.