Nicaragua vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre

Nicaragua
1.72 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
1.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Nicaragua rank
148th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
151st

Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Nicaragua
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
00.511.5196119922023

How they compare

Nicaragua currently reports 1.72 units per square kilometre against 1.62 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of, a difference of 0.1 units per square kilometre.

That makes Nicaragua's figure about 1.1 times Tanzania, United Republic of's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Nicaragua ahead.

Nicaragua ranks 148th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Nicaragua averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Nicaragua Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3309 units per square kilometre 0.2627 units per square kilometre 0.0682 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
1970s 0.4269 units per square kilometre 0.3607 units per square kilometre 0.0662 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
1980s 0.5187 units per square kilometre 0.5238 units per square kilometre 0.0051 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of
1990s 0.7026 units per square kilometre 0.6563 units per square kilometre 0.0463 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
2000s 0.9783 units per square kilometre 0.7602 units per square kilometre 0.2181 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
2010s 1.38 units per square kilometre 1.21 units per square kilometre 0.1638 units per square kilometre Nicaragua
2020s 1.66 units per square kilometre 1.55 units per square kilometre 0.1078 units per square kilometre Nicaragua

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre, Nicaragua or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Nicaragua, at 1.72 units per square kilometre against 1.62 units per square kilometre in Tanzania, United Republic of as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre between Nicaragua and Tanzania, United Republic of?
0.1 units per square kilometre, with Nicaragua ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Nicaragua and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Nicaragua and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre?
Nicaragua ranks 148th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 151st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Nicaragua vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-male-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-male-per-square-kilometre/nicaragua/tanzania/">Nicaragua vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 40-44, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.