Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Japan: Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1.04 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Japan
10.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
38th
Japan rank
41st

Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Japan
051015196119922023

How they compare

Japan currently reports 10.62 units per square kilometre against 1.04 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 9.58 units per square kilometre.

That makes Japan's figure about 10.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Japan has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th and Japan ranks 41st of 43 groups.

Japan has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Japan Difference Ahead
1960s 0.2544 units per square kilometre 7.77 units per square kilometre 7.52 units per square kilometre Japan
1970s 0.3102 units per square kilometre 11 units per square kilometre 10.69 units per square kilometre Japan
1980s 0.3796 units per square kilometre 12.68 units per square kilometre 12.31 units per square kilometre Japan
1990s 0.4646 units per square kilometre 13.07 units per square kilometre 12.61 units per square kilometre Japan
2000s 0.6108 units per square kilometre 11.24 units per square kilometre 10.63 units per square kilometre Japan
2010s 0.7851 units per square kilometre 13.1 units per square kilometre 12.32 units per square kilometre Japan
2020s 0.9833 units per square kilometre 11.16 units per square kilometre 10.18 units per square kilometre Japan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Japan?
Japan, at 10.62 units per square kilometre against 1.04 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Japan?
9.58 units per square kilometre, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Japan?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Japan rank globally for population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 38th and Japan ranks 41st of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Japan: Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-male-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/japan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-male-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/japan/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Japan: Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 40-44, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.