Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre

Belgium
12.69 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
1.22 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
32nd
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
29th

Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
051015196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 12.69 units per square kilometre against 1.22 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 11.47 units per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 10.4 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 29th of 216 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 13.4 units per square kilometre 0.7223 units per square kilometre 12.68 units per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 12.69 units per square kilometre 0.914 units per square kilometre 11.78 units per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 12.5 units per square kilometre 1.16 units per square kilometre 11.35 units per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre, Belgium or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Belgium, at 12.69 units per square kilometre against 1.22 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre between Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
11.47 units per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 32nd and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 29th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-male-per-square-kilometre/belgium/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-male-per-square-kilometre/belgium/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 40-44, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 40-44, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.