East Timor vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre

East Timor
2.02 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
2.09 units per square kilometre
in 2023
East Timor rank
136th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
133rd

Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre over time

  • East Timor
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 2.09 units per square kilometre against 2.02 units per square kilometre in East Timor, a difference of 0.07 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was East Timor ahead.

East Timor ranks 136th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 133rd of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Timor averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Timor Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.8085 units per square kilometre 0.1577 units per square kilometre 0.6509 units per square kilometre East Timor
1970s 1 units per square kilometre 0.1698 units per square kilometre 0.835 units per square kilometre East Timor
1980s 1.27 units per square kilometre 0.2228 units per square kilometre 1.05 units per square kilometre East Timor
1990s 1.34 units per square kilometre 0.4583 units per square kilometre 0.8819 units per square kilometre East Timor
2000s 1.56 units per square kilometre 1 units per square kilometre 0.5597 units per square kilometre East Timor
2010s 1.69 units per square kilometre 1.62 units per square kilometre 0.0671 units per square kilometre East Timor
2020s 1.85 units per square kilometre 2.06 units per square kilometre 0.2095 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre, East Timor or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 2.09 units per square kilometre against 2.02 units per square kilometre in East Timor as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre between East Timor and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.07 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Timor and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do East Timor and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre?
East Timor ranks 136th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 133rd of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Timor vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 November 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-female-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-female-per-square-kilometre/timor-leste/turks-and-caicos-islands/">East Timor vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 40-44, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.