Macau, China vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre

Macau, China
896.24 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
16.15 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Macau, China rank
1st
South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank
1st

Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Macau, China
  • South Asia (IDA & IBRD)
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Macau, China currently reports 896.24 units per square kilometre against 16.15 units per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD), a difference of 880.09 units per square kilometre.

That makes Macau, China's figure about 55.5 times South Asia (IDA & IBRD)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Macau, China has been ahead every year.

Macau, China ranks 1st and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 1st of 216 countries.

Macau, China has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Macau, China South Asia (IDA & IBRD) Difference Ahead
1960s 302.29 units per square kilometre 4 units per square kilometre 298.29 units per square kilometre Macau, China
1970s 220.85 units per square kilometre 4.86 units per square kilometre 215.99 units per square kilometre Macau, China
1980s 266.07 units per square kilometre 5.81 units per square kilometre 260.26 units per square kilometre Macau, China
1990s 772.4 units per square kilometre 8.22 units per square kilometre 764.19 units per square kilometre Macau, China
2000s 917.4 units per square kilometre 10.89 units per square kilometre 906.51 units per square kilometre Macau, China
2010s 887.37 units per square kilometre 13.49 units per square kilometre 873.88 units per square kilometre Macau, China
2020s 845.62 units per square kilometre 15.56 units per square kilometre 830.07 units per square kilometre Macau, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre, Macau, China or South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
Macau, China, at 896.24 units per square kilometre against 16.15 units per square kilometre in South Asia (IDA & IBRD) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre between Macau, China and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
880.09 units per square kilometre, with Macau, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Macau, China and South Asia (IDA & IBRD)?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Macau, China and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) rank globally for population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre?
Macau, China ranks 1st and South Asia (IDA & IBRD) ranks 1st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Macau, China vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-female-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-40-44-female-per-square-kilometre/macao-sar-china/south-asia-ida-and-ibrd/">Macau, China vs South Asia (IDA & IBRD): Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 40-44, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 40-44, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.