South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre

South Africa
2.19 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
2.29 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
140th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
138th

Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 2.29 units per square kilometre against 2.19 units per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.1 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 140th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 138th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 4 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.4406 units per square kilometre 0.1142 units per square kilometre 0.3264 units per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 0.5588 units per square kilometre 0.1244 units per square kilometre 0.4344 units per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 0.8609 units per square kilometre 0.3086 units per square kilometre 0.5523 units per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 1.13 units per square kilometre 0.6812 units per square kilometre 0.4534 units per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 1.15 units per square kilometre 1.33 units per square kilometre 0.1852 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 1.57 units per square kilometre 2.01 units per square kilometre 0.434 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 2.12 units per square kilometre 2.31 units per square kilometre 0.1951 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre, South Africa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 2.29 units per square kilometre against 2.19 units per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre between South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.1 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 140th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 138th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-male-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-male-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 35-39, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 35-39, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.