Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre

Late-demographic dividend
2.03 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
18.67 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
19th
Rwanda rank
18th

Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Rwanda
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 18.67 units per square kilometre against 2.03 units per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 16.64 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 9.2 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 43 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 1.46 units per square kilometre 3.54 units per square kilometre 2.08 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 1.62 units per square kilometre 3.69 units per square kilometre 2.07 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 2.03 units per square kilometre 5.61 units per square kilometre 3.58 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 1.82 units per square kilometre 7.57 units per square kilometre 5.76 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 2 units per square kilometre 9.08 units per square kilometre 7.08 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 1.85 units per square kilometre 13.57 units per square kilometre 11.72 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 1.97 units per square kilometre 18.15 units per square kilometre 16.18 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre, Late-demographic dividend or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 18.67 units per square kilometre against 2.03 units per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre between Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
16.64 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 19th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/rwanda/">Late-demographic dividend vs Rwanda: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.