Guinea-Bissau vs South Africa: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre

Guinea-Bissau
2.33 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa
2.21 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Guinea-Bissau rank
135th
South Africa rank
137th

Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • South Africa
0.511.522.5196119922023

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 2.33 units per square kilometre against 2.21 units per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.12 units per square kilometre.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times South Africa's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and South Africa ranks 137th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 5 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau South Africa Difference Ahead
1960s 0.653 units per square kilometre 0.406 units per square kilometre 0.247 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1970s 0.6455 units per square kilometre 0.5325 units per square kilometre 0.1131 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1980s 0.8579 units per square kilometre 0.793 units per square kilometre 0.0649 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
1990s 1.07 units per square kilometre 1.16 units per square kilometre 0.0857 units per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 1.26 units per square kilometre 1.43 units per square kilometre 0.1714 units per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 1.82 units per square kilometre 1.67 units per square kilometre 0.1468 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau
2020s 2.23 units per square kilometre 2.13 units per square kilometre 0.1053 units per square kilometre Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre, Guinea-Bissau or South Africa?
Guinea-Bissau, at 2.33 units per square kilometre against 2.21 units per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre between Guinea-Bissau and South Africa?
0.12 units per square kilometre, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and South Africa?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Guinea-Bissau and South Africa rank globally for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 135th and South Africa ranks 137th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Guinea-Bissau vs South Africa: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/guinea-bissau/south-africa/">Guinea-Bissau vs South Africa: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.