Aruba vs Rwanda: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre

Aruba
19.52 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
18.67 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
17th
Rwanda rank
18th

Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Rwanda
510152025196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 19.52 units per square kilometre against 18.67 units per square kilometre in Rwanda, a difference of 0.85 units per square kilometre.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 216 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 8.88 units per square kilometre 3.54 units per square kilometre 5.34 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 10.77 units per square kilometre 3.69 units per square kilometre 7.08 units per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 13.82 units per square kilometre 5.61 units per square kilometre 8.21 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 21.28 units per square kilometre 7.57 units per square kilometre 13.71 units per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 24.31 units per square kilometre 9.08 units per square kilometre 15.23 units per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 21.49 units per square kilometre 13.57 units per square kilometre 7.93 units per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 19.98 units per square kilometre 18.15 units per square kilometre 1.82 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre, Aruba or Rwanda?
Aruba, at 19.52 units per square kilometre against 18.67 units per square kilometre in Rwanda as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre between Aruba and Rwanda?
0.85 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 17th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Rwanda: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/aruba/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/aruba/rwanda/">Aruba vs Rwanda: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.