Aruba vs Least developed countries: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre

Aruba
19.52 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
1.71 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
17th
Least developed countries rank
20th

Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Aruba
  • Least developed countries
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Aruba currently reports 19.52 units per square kilometre against 1.71 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 17.81 units per square kilometre.

That makes Aruba's figure about 11.4 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.

Aruba ranks 17th and Least developed countries ranks 20th of 216 countries.

Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Aruba Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1960s 8.88 units per square kilometre 0.4569 units per square kilometre 8.42 units per square kilometre Aruba
1970s 10.77 units per square kilometre 0.5462 units per square kilometre 10.23 units per square kilometre Aruba
1980s 13.82 units per square kilometre 0.6826 units per square kilometre 13.13 units per square kilometre Aruba
1990s 21.28 units per square kilometre 0.8878 units per square kilometre 20.39 units per square kilometre Aruba
2000s 24.31 units per square kilometre 1.14 units per square kilometre 23.18 units per square kilometre Aruba
2010s 21.49 units per square kilometre 1.35 units per square kilometre 20.14 units per square kilometre Aruba
2020s 19.98 units per square kilometre 1.63 units per square kilometre 18.34 units per square kilometre Aruba

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre, Aruba or Least developed countries?
Aruba, at 19.52 units per square kilometre against 1.71 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre between Aruba and Least developed countries?
17.81 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Least developed countries?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Aruba and Least developed countries rank globally for population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre?
Aruba ranks 17th and Least developed countries ranks 20th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Aruba vs Least developed countries: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/aruba/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-35-39-female-per-square-kilometre/aruba/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Aruba vs Least developed countries: Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 35-39, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 35-39, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.