East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Population ages 30-34, male, per capita

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
0.0377 units per person
in 2025
Iceland
0.0446 units per person
in 2025
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) rank
18th
Iceland rank
20th

Population ages 30-34, male, per capita over time

  • East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
  • Iceland
00.010.020.030.040.05196019922025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 0.0446 units per person against 0.0377 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income), a difference of 0.0069 units per person.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)'s.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Iceland ahead.

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 18th and Iceland ranks 20th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) averaged higher in 4 and Iceland in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) Iceland Difference Ahead
1960s 0.0338 units per person 0.0315 units per person 0.0023 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
1970s 0.0301 units per person 0.031 units per person 0.0009 units per person Iceland
1980s 0.0378 units per person 0.0398 units per person 0.002 units per person Iceland
1990s 0.0413 units per person 0.0402 units per person 0.0011 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2000s 0.0441 units per person 0.0367 units per person 0.0074 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2010s 0.0391 units per person 0.0368 units per person 0.0022 units per person East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income)
2020s 0.0411 units per person 0.044 units per person 0.0028 units per person Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 30-34, male, per capita, East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) or Iceland?
Iceland, at 0.0446 units per person against 0.0377 units per person in East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 30-34, male, per capita between East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland?
0.0069 units per person, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) and Iceland rank globally for population ages 30-34, male, per capita?
East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) ranks 18th and Iceland ranks 20th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 30-34, male, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Population ages 30-34, male, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-30-34-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-30-34-male-per-capita/east-asia-and-pacific-excluding-high-income/iceland/">East Asia & Pacific (excluding high income) vs Iceland: Population ages 30-34, male, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 30-34, male, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 30-34, male divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.