Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre

Least developed countries
1.97 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
20.34 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
20th
Rwanda rank
17th

Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Rwanda
05101520196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 20.34 units per square kilometre against 1.97 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 18.37 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 10.3 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 43 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5303 units per square kilometre 3.92 units per square kilometre 3.39 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 0.6405 units per square kilometre 4.4 units per square kilometre 3.76 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 0.8295 units per square kilometre 7.91 units per square kilometre 7.08 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 1.06 units per square kilometre 8.94 units per square kilometre 7.88 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 1.36 units per square kilometre 11.19 units per square kilometre 9.84 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 1.61 units per square kilometre 17.4 units per square kilometre 15.79 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 1.9 units per square kilometre 20.07 units per square kilometre 18.17 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 20.34 units per square kilometre against 1.97 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Rwanda?
18.37 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 20th and Rwanda ranks 17th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-30-34-female-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-30-34-female-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/">Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 30-34, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.