Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Israel: Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
1.58 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Israel
14.62 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) rank
30th
Israel rank
29th

Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)
  • Israel
051015196119922023

How they compare

Israel currently reports 14.62 units per square kilometre against 1.58 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC), a difference of 13.04 units per square kilometre.

That makes Israel's figure about 9.3 times Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC)'s.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Israel has been ahead every year.

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 30th and Israel ranks 29th of 43 groups.

Israel has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) Israel Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3636 units per square kilometre 3.63 units per square kilometre 3.27 units per square kilometre Israel
1970s 0.4485 units per square kilometre 4.68 units per square kilometre 4.23 units per square kilometre Israel
1980s 0.5783 units per square kilometre 7.27 units per square kilometre 6.69 units per square kilometre Israel
1990s 0.7408 units per square kilometre 8.53 units per square kilometre 7.79 units per square kilometre Israel
2000s 0.963 units per square kilometre 11.48 units per square kilometre 10.52 units per square kilometre Israel
2010s 1.21 units per square kilometre 13.26 units per square kilometre 12.05 units per square kilometre Israel
2020s 1.5 units per square kilometre 14.19 units per square kilometre 12.69 units per square kilometre Israel

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre, Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) or Israel?
Israel, at 14.62 units per square kilometre against 1.58 units per square kilometre in Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre between Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Israel?
13.04 units per square kilometre, with Israel ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Israel?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) and Israel rank globally for population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre?
Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) ranks 30th and Israel ranks 29th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Israel: Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-30-34-female-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/israel/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-30-34-female-per-square-kilometre/heavily-indebted-poor-countries-hipc/israel/">Heavily indebted poor countries (HIPC) vs Israel: Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 30-34, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 30-34, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.