Central Europe and the Baltics vs Rwanda: Population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre

Central Europe and the Baltics
2.6 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
21.32 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Central Europe and the Baltics rank
16th
Rwanda rank
18th

Population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre over time

  • Central Europe and the Baltics
  • Rwanda
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 21.32 units per square kilometre against 2.6 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics, a difference of 18.72 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 8.2 times Central Europe and the Baltics's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Central Europe and the Baltics ahead.

Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 43 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Central Europe and the Baltics averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Central Europe and the Baltics Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 4.65 units per square kilometre 4.25 units per square kilometre 0.4041 units per square kilometre Central Europe and the Baltics
1970s 5.29 units per square kilometre 6.42 units per square kilometre 1.13 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 5.83 units per square kilometre 9.85 units per square kilometre 4.02 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 3.86 units per square kilometre 9.57 units per square kilometre 5.71 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 3.81 units per square kilometre 13.24 units per square kilometre 9.43 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 3.37 units per square kilometre 19.75 units per square kilometre 16.38 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 2.72 units per square kilometre 20.96 units per square kilometre 18.24 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre, Central Europe and the Baltics or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 21.32 units per square kilometre against 2.6 units per square kilometre in Central Europe and the Baltics as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre between Central Europe and the Baltics and Rwanda?
18.72 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Central Europe and the Baltics and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Central Europe and the Baltics and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre?
Central Europe and the Baltics ranks 16th and Rwanda ranks 18th of 43 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Central Europe and the Baltics vs Rwanda: Population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-male-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-male-per-square-kilometre/central-europe-and-the-baltics/rwanda/">Central Europe and the Baltics vs Rwanda: Population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 25-29, male, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 25-29, male divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.