Mozambique vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre

Mozambique
1.7 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
1.81 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Mozambique rank
153rd
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
151st

Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Mozambique
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 1.81 units per square kilometre against 1.7 units per square kilometre in Mozambique, a difference of 0.11 units per square kilometre.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Mozambique's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Mozambique ahead.

Mozambique ranks 153rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 151st of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Mozambique averaged higher in 3 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 4.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mozambique Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.36 units per square kilometre 0.1678 units per square kilometre 0.1922 units per square kilometre Mozambique
1970s 0.4783 units per square kilometre 0.1749 units per square kilometre 0.3033 units per square kilometre Mozambique
1980s 0.6652 units per square kilometre 0.3939 units per square kilometre 0.2713 units per square kilometre Mozambique
1990s 0.6811 units per square kilometre 0.8144 units per square kilometre 0.1334 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.9736 units per square kilometre 1.13 units per square kilometre 0.1533 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 1.3 units per square kilometre 1.34 units per square kilometre 0.0369 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 1.62 units per square kilometre 1.74 units per square kilometre 0.1236 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre, Mozambique or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 1.81 units per square kilometre against 1.7 units per square kilometre in Mozambique as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre between Mozambique and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.11 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mozambique and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Mozambique and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre?
Mozambique ranks 153rd and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 151st of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mozambique vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/mozambique/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Mozambique vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 25-29, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.