Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre

Lao People's Democratic Republic
1.47 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Zimbabwe
1.49 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Lao People's Democratic Republic rank
159th
Zimbabwe rank
158th

Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Lao People's Democratic Republic
  • Zimbabwe
0.511.52196119922023

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 1.49 units per square kilometre against 1.47 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic, a difference of 0.02 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Lao People's Democratic Republic ahead.

Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 216 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Lao People's Democratic Republic averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 6.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lao People's Democratic Republic Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1960s 0.3746 units per square kilometre 0.3742 units per square kilometre 0.0003 units per square kilometre Lao People's Democratic Republic
1970s 0.4725 units per square kilometre 0.5346 units per square kilometre 0.0622 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1980s 0.5687 units per square kilometre 0.8474 units per square kilometre 0.2787 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
1990s 0.7755 units per square kilometre 1.05 units per square kilometre 0.274 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2000s 0.9524 units per square kilometre 1.63 units per square kilometre 0.6808 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2010s 1.3 units per square kilometre 1.69 units per square kilometre 0.392 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe
2020s 1.45 units per square kilometre 1.46 units per square kilometre 0.0071 units per square kilometre Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre, Lao People's Democratic Republic or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 1.49 units per square kilometre against 1.47 units per square kilometre in Lao People's Democratic Republic as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre between Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
0.02 units per square kilometre, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Lao People's Democratic Republic and Zimbabwe rank globally for population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre?
Lao People's Democratic Republic ranks 159th and Zimbabwe ranks 158th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/lao-pdr/zimbabwe/">Lao People's Democratic Republic vs Zimbabwe: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 25-29, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.