Faroe Islands vs Papua New Guinea: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre

Faroe Islands
0.9839 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Papua New Guinea
0.9368 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Faroe Islands rank
177th
Papua New Guinea rank
179th

Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Faroe Islands
  • Papua New Guinea
0.250.50.7511.2196119922023

How they compare

Faroe Islands currently reports 0.9839 units per square kilometre against 0.9368 units per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.0471 units per square kilometre.

That makes Faroe Islands's figure about 1.1 times Papua New Guinea's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Faroe Islands ahead.

Faroe Islands ranks 177th and Papua New Guinea ranks 179th of 216 countries.

Faroe Islands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Faroe Islands Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1960s 0.711 units per square kilometre 0.1909 units per square kilometre 0.5201 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1970s 0.9597 units per square kilometre 0.2231 units per square kilometre 0.7366 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1980s 1.13 units per square kilometre 0.2765 units per square kilometre 0.8553 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
1990s 1.02 units per square kilometre 0.4109 units per square kilometre 0.6047 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2000s 0.8635 units per square kilometre 0.6004 units per square kilometre 0.2631 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2010s 0.8458 units per square kilometre 0.81 units per square kilometre 0.0358 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands
2020s 0.9881 units per square kilometre 0.9194 units per square kilometre 0.0688 units per square kilometre Faroe Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre, Faroe Islands or Papua New Guinea?
Faroe Islands, at 0.9839 units per square kilometre against 0.9368 units per square kilometre in Papua New Guinea as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre between Faroe Islands and Papua New Guinea?
0.0471 units per square kilometre, with Faroe Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Faroe Islands and Papua New Guinea?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Faroe Islands and Papua New Guinea rank globally for population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre?
Faroe Islands ranks 177th and Papua New Guinea ranks 179th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Faroe Islands vs Papua New Guinea: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/faroe-islands/papua-new-guinea/">Faroe Islands vs Papua New Guinea: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 25-29, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.