Barbados vs Least developed countries: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre

Barbados
20.81 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries
2.34 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Barbados rank
17th
Least developed countries rank
17th

Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Barbados
  • Least developed countries
0102030196119922023

How they compare

Barbados currently reports 20.81 units per square kilometre against 2.34 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 18.47 units per square kilometre.

That makes Barbados's figure about 8.9 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Barbados has been ahead every year.

Barbados ranks 17th and Least developed countries ranks 17th of 216 countries.

Barbados has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Barbados Least developed countries Difference Ahead
1960s 20.44 units per square kilometre 0.6099 units per square kilometre 19.83 units per square kilometre Barbados
1970s 23.42 units per square kilometre 0.7544 units per square kilometre 22.67 units per square kilometre Barbados
1980s 27.19 units per square kilometre 1 units per square kilometre 26.18 units per square kilometre Barbados
1990s 26.33 units per square kilometre 1.27 units per square kilometre 25.06 units per square kilometre Barbados
2000s 23.09 units per square kilometre 1.63 units per square kilometre 21.47 units per square kilometre Barbados
2010s 22.36 units per square kilometre 1.9 units per square kilometre 20.47 units per square kilometre Barbados
2020s 21.24 units per square kilometre 2.25 units per square kilometre 18.99 units per square kilometre Barbados

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre, Barbados or Least developed countries?
Barbados, at 20.81 units per square kilometre against 2.34 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre between Barbados and Least developed countries?
18.47 units per square kilometre, with Barbados ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Barbados and Least developed countries?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Barbados and Least developed countries rank globally for population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre?
Barbados ranks 17th and Least developed countries ranks 17th of 216 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Barbados vs Least developed countries: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/barbados/least-developed-countries-un-classification/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-25-29-female-per-square-kilometre/barbados/least-developed-countries-un-classification/">Barbados vs Least developed countries: Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
260 places, 15,090 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 25-29, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.