Aruba vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre
Aruba
15.94 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
2.07 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Aruba rank
26th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
23rd
Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre over time
- Aruba
- Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
How they compare
Aruba currently reports 15.94 units per square kilometre against 2.07 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 13.87 units per square kilometre.
That makes Aruba's figure about 7.7 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.
Across all 63 years both countries report, Aruba has been ahead every year.
Aruba ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 216 countries.
Aruba has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Aruba | Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.94 units per square kilometre | 0.4774 units per square kilometre | 11.46 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1970s | 13.36 units per square kilometre | 0.5979 units per square kilometre | 12.76 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1980s | 16.53 units per square kilometre | 0.8095 units per square kilometre | 15.72 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 1990s | 15.83 units per square kilometre | 1.05 units per square kilometre | 14.78 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2000s | 17.3 units per square kilometre | 1.39 units per square kilometre | 15.91 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2010s | 17.6 units per square kilometre | 1.68 units per square kilometre | 15.92 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
| 2020s | 16.96 units per square kilometre | 1.99 units per square kilometre | 14.97 units per square kilometre | Aruba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre, Aruba or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- Aruba, at 15.94 units per square kilometre against 2.07 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
- What is the difference in population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre between Aruba and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 13.87 units per square kilometre, with Aruba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Aruba and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
- 63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
- How do Aruba and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre?
- Aruba ranks 26th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 23rd of 216 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 25-29, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Population ages 25-29, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.