What is the difference in population ages 20-24, female, per capita between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?

0.0002 units per person, with Cape Verde ahead.

How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?

66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.

Where does this data come from?

Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 20-24, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 20-24, female, per capita

Cape Verde

0.0385 units per person

in 2025

Equatorial Guinea

0.0383 units per person

in 2025

Cape Verde rank

97th

Equatorial Guinea rank

98th

Population ages 20-24, female, per capita over time

Cape Verde
Equatorial Guinea

How they compare

Cape Verde currently reports 0.0385 units per person against 0.0383 units per person in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.0002 units per person.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Cape Verde ahead.

Cape Verde ranks 97th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 98th of 218 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 6 and Equatorial Guinea in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Cape Verde	Equatorial Guinea	Difference	Ahead
1960s	0.0384 units per person	0.0393 units per person	0.0009 units per person	Equatorial Guinea
1970s	0.0449 units per person	0.0433 units per person	0.0017 units per person	Cape Verde
1980s	0.049 units per person	0.0443 units per person	0.0047 units per person	Cape Verde
1990s	0.0454 units per person	0.0403 units per person	0.0051 units per person	Cape Verde
2000s	0.0486 units per person	0.04 units per person	0.0086 units per person	Cape Verde
2010s	0.0507 units per person	0.0413 units per person	0.0094 units per person	Cape Verde
2020s	0.0381 units per person	0.0368 units per person	0.0013 units per person	Cape Verde

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 20-24, female, per capita, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?: Cape Verde, at 0.0385 units per person against 0.0383 units per person in Equatorial Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 20-24, female, per capita between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?: 0.0002 units per person, with Cape Verde ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?: 66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for population ages 20-24, female, per capita?: Cape Verde ranks 97th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 98th of 218 countries.
Where does this data come from?: Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 20-24, female, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 20-24, female, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-20-24-female-per-capita/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-20-24-female-per-capita/cabo-verde/equatorial-guinea/">Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Population ages 20-24, female, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Population ages 20-24, female, per capita
Unit: units per person
Source: Statizoid (derived)
Licence: Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage: 262 places, 17,262 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed: 08 September 2026

Population ages 20-24, female divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.