South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre

South Africa
35.12 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Turks and Caicos Islands
35.44 units per square kilometre
in 2023
South Africa rank
145th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
144th

Population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre over time

  • South Africa
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
010203040196119922023

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 35.44 units per square kilometre against 35.12 units per square kilometre in South Africa, a difference of 0.32 units per square kilometre.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was South Africa ahead.

South Africa ranks 145th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 144th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, South Africa averaged higher in 6 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 8.6 units per square kilometre 2.93 units per square kilometre 5.67 units per square kilometre South Africa
1970s 11.39 units per square kilometre 3.39 units per square kilometre 7.99 units per square kilometre South Africa
1980s 16.14 units per square kilometre 5.91 units per square kilometre 10.23 units per square kilometre South Africa
1990s 21.28 units per square kilometre 10.41 units per square kilometre 10.87 units per square kilometre South Africa
2000s 25.71 units per square kilometre 17.25 units per square kilometre 8.46 units per square kilometre South Africa
2010s 30.46 units per square kilometre 27.56 units per square kilometre 2.91 units per square kilometre South Africa
2020s 34.29 units per square kilometre 34.94 units per square kilometre 0.6411 units per square kilometre Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre, South Africa or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 35.44 units per square kilometre against 35.12 units per square kilometre in South Africa as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre between South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.32 units per square kilometre, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do South Africa and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre?
South Africa ranks 145th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 144th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-total-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-total-per-square-kilometre/south-africa/turks-and-caicos-islands/">South Africa vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, total, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, total divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.