Early-demographic dividend vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 15-64, total, per capita

Early-demographic dividend
0.6626 units per person
in 2025
Turks and Caicos Islands
0.7235 units per person
in 2025
Early-demographic dividend rank
14th
Turks and Caicos Islands rank
14th

Population ages 15-64, total, per capita over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Turks and Caicos Islands
00.20.40.60.8196019922025

How they compare

Turks and Caicos Islands currently reports 0.7235 units per person against 0.6626 units per person in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 0.0609 units per person.

That makes Turks and Caicos Islands's figure about 1.1 times Early-demographic dividend's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 66 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Early-demographic dividend ahead.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 14th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 14th of 45 groups.

Across the 7 decades both report, Early-demographic dividend averaged higher in 2 and Turks and Caicos Islands in 5.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Turks and Caicos Islands Difference Ahead
1960s 0.5429 units per person 0.4925 units per person 0.0504 units per person Early-demographic dividend
1970s 0.5416 units per person 0.5017 units per person 0.0398 units per person Early-demographic dividend
1980s 0.5554 units per person 0.5966 units per person 0.0412 units per person Turks and Caicos Islands
1990s 0.5758 units per person 0.6694 units per person 0.0936 units per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2000s 0.6106 units per person 0.6965 units per person 0.0859 units per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2010s 0.6407 units per person 0.7242 units per person 0.0835 units per person Turks and Caicos Islands
2020s 0.6576 units per person 0.7289 units per person 0.0712 units per person Turks and Caicos Islands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, total, per capita, Early-demographic dividend or Turks and Caicos Islands?
Turks and Caicos Islands, at 0.7235 units per person against 0.6626 units per person in Early-demographic dividend as of 2025.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, total, per capita between Early-demographic dividend and Turks and Caicos Islands?
0.0609 units per person, with Turks and Caicos Islands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Turks and Caicos Islands?
66 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2025.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Turks and Caicos Islands rank globally for population ages 15-64, total, per capita?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 14th and Turks and Caicos Islands ranks 14th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, total, per capita. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 15-64, total, per capita. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-total-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/turks-and-caicos-islands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-total-per-capita/early-demographic-dividend/turks-and-caicos-islands/">Early-demographic dividend vs Turks and Caicos Islands: Population ages 15-64, total, per capita</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, total, per capita
Unit
units per person
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
265 places, 17,460 data points, 1960–2025
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, total divided by Population, total, matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.