Panama vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre

Panama
19.66 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Tanzania, United Republic of
20.66 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Panama rank
139th
Tanzania, United Republic of rank
137th

Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Panama
  • Tanzania, United Republic of
5101520196119922023

How they compare

Tanzania, United Republic of currently reports 20.66 units per square kilometre against 19.66 units per square kilometre in Panama, a difference of 1 units per square kilometre.

That makes Tanzania, United Republic of's figure about 1.1 times Panama's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 63 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Panama ahead.

Panama ranks 139th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 137th of 215 countries.

Across the 7 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 6 and Tanzania, United Republic of in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Panama Tanzania, United Republic of Difference Ahead
1960s 4.5 units per square kilometre 3.49 units per square kilometre 1.01 units per square kilometre Panama
1970s 6.04 units per square kilometre 4.65 units per square kilometre 1.39 units per square kilometre Panama
1980s 8.33 units per square kilometre 6.37 units per square kilometre 1.96 units per square kilometre Panama
1990s 11.03 units per square kilometre 8.78 units per square kilometre 2.25 units per square kilometre Panama
2000s 14.01 units per square kilometre 11.68 units per square kilometre 2.34 units per square kilometre Panama
2010s 17.11 units per square kilometre 15.63 units per square kilometre 1.48 units per square kilometre Panama
2020s 19.24 units per square kilometre 19.69 units per square kilometre 0.4514 units per square kilometre Tanzania, United Republic of

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre, Panama or Tanzania, United Republic of?
Tanzania, United Republic of, at 20.66 units per square kilometre against 19.66 units per square kilometre in Panama as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre between Panama and Tanzania, United Republic of?
1 units per square kilometre, with Tanzania, United Republic of ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Tanzania, United Republic of?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Panama and Tanzania, United Republic of rank globally for population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre?
Panama ranks 139th and Tanzania, United Republic of ranks 137th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Panama vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/panama/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/panama/tanzania/">Panama vs Tanzania, United Republic of: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.