Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre

Least developed countries
16.59 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Rwanda
170.84 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Least developed countries rank
22nd
Rwanda rank
21st

Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Least developed countries
  • Rwanda
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Rwanda currently reports 170.84 units per square kilometre against 16.59 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries, a difference of 154.25 units per square kilometre.

That makes Rwanda's figure about 10.3 times Least developed countries's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Rwanda has been ahead every year.

Least developed countries ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 21st of 45 groups.

Rwanda has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Least developed countries Rwanda Difference Ahead
1960s 4.49 units per square kilometre 33.17 units per square kilometre 28.68 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1970s 5.6 units per square kilometre 46.48 units per square kilometre 40.89 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1980s 7.15 units per square kilometre 62.47 units per square kilometre 55.32 units per square kilometre Rwanda
1990s 8.98 units per square kilometre 75.5 units per square kilometre 66.52 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2000s 11.57 units per square kilometre 104.43 units per square kilometre 92.86 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2010s 13.59 units per square kilometre 136.14 units per square kilometre 122.55 units per square kilometre Rwanda
2020s 15.95 units per square kilometre 164.19 units per square kilometre 148.24 units per square kilometre Rwanda

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre, Least developed countries or Rwanda?
Rwanda, at 170.84 units per square kilometre against 16.59 units per square kilometre in Least developed countries as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre between Least developed countries and Rwanda?
154.25 units per square kilometre, with Rwanda ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Least developed countries and Rwanda?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Least developed countries and Rwanda rank globally for population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre?
Least developed countries ranks 22nd and Rwanda ranks 21st of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/least-developed-countries-un-classification/rwanda/">Least developed countries vs Rwanda: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.