Late-demographic dividend vs Netherlands: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre

Late-demographic dividend
17.58 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Netherlands
170.66 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Late-demographic dividend rank
21st
Netherlands rank
22nd

Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Late-demographic dividend
  • Netherlands
050100150196119922023

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 170.66 units per square kilometre against 17.58 units per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend, a difference of 153.08 units per square kilometre.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 9.7 times Late-demographic dividend's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 45 groups.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Late-demographic dividend Netherlands Difference Ahead
1960s 13.59 units per square kilometre 112.98 units per square kilometre 99.39 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1970s 16.93 units per square kilometre 127.32 units per square kilometre 110.39 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1980s 21.38 units per square kilometre 144.26 units per square kilometre 122.88 units per square kilometre Netherlands
1990s 16.33 units per square kilometre 153.94 units per square kilometre 137.61 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2000s 16.4 units per square kilometre 161.34 units per square kilometre 144.94 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2010s 17.6 units per square kilometre 164.89 units per square kilometre 147.28 units per square kilometre Netherlands
2020s 17.61 units per square kilometre 168.81 units per square kilometre 151.21 units per square kilometre Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre, Late-demographic dividend or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 170.66 units per square kilometre against 17.58 units per square kilometre in Late-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre between Late-demographic dividend and Netherlands?
153.08 units per square kilometre, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Late-demographic dividend and Netherlands?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Late-demographic dividend and Netherlands rank globally for population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre?
Late-demographic dividend ranks 21st and Netherlands ranks 22nd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Late-demographic dividend vs Netherlands: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/late-demographic-dividend/netherlands/">Late-demographic dividend vs Netherlands: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.