High income vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre

High income
8.64 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Trinidad and Tobago
93.21 units per square kilometre
in 2023
High income rank
41st
Trinidad and Tobago rank
43rd

Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • High income
  • Trinidad and Tobago
020406080100196119922023

How they compare

Trinidad and Tobago currently reports 93.21 units per square kilometre against 8.64 units per square kilometre in High income, a difference of 84.57 units per square kilometre.

That makes Trinidad and Tobago's figure about 10.8 times High income's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Trinidad and Tobago has been ahead every year.

High income ranks 41st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 43rd of 45 groups.

Trinidad and Tobago has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade High income Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1960s 8.9 units per square kilometre 48.51 units per square kilometre 39.61 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1970s 9.86 units per square kilometre 59.79 units per square kilometre 49.92 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1980s 10.84 units per square kilometre 71.45 units per square kilometre 60.62 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
1990s 8.57 units per square kilometre 81.71 units per square kilometre 73.14 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2000s 8.34 units per square kilometre 92.8 units per square kilometre 84.46 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2010s 8.62 units per square kilometre 95.46 units per square kilometre 86.84 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 8.61 units per square kilometre 93.78 units per square kilometre 85.17 units per square kilometre Trinidad and Tobago

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre, High income or Trinidad and Tobago?
Trinidad and Tobago, at 93.21 units per square kilometre against 8.64 units per square kilometre in High income as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre between High income and Trinidad and Tobago?
84.57 units per square kilometre, with Trinidad and Tobago ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for High income and Trinidad and Tobago?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do High income and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre?
High income ranks 41st and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 43rd of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

High income vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/high-income/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/high-income/trinidad-and-tobago/">High income vs Trinidad and Tobago: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.