Early-demographic dividend vs Gibraltar: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre

Early-demographic dividend
34.1 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Gibraltar
1,240 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Early-demographic dividend rank
7th
Gibraltar rank
5th

Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Early-demographic dividend
  • Gibraltar
02505007501.0k1.2k196119922023

How they compare

Gibraltar currently reports 1,240 units per square kilometre against 34.1 units per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend, a difference of 1,206 units per square kilometre.

That makes Gibraltar's figure about 36.4 times Early-demographic dividend's.

Across all 63 years both countries report, Gibraltar has been ahead every year.

Early-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Gibraltar ranks 5th of 45 groups.

Gibraltar has averaged higher in every one of the 7 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Early-demographic dividend Gibraltar Difference Ahead
1960s 9.38 units per square kilometre 787.71 units per square kilometre 778.33 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1970s 11.89 units per square kilometre 865.82 units per square kilometre 853.93 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1980s 15.68 units per square kilometre 884.6 units per square kilometre 868.92 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
1990s 19.54 units per square kilometre 855.32 units per square kilometre 835.78 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2000s 24.52 units per square kilometre 936.23 units per square kilometre 911.71 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2010s 29.9 units per square kilometre 1,062 units per square kilometre 1,032 units per square kilometre Gibraltar
2020s 33.37 units per square kilometre 1,200 units per square kilometre 1,166 units per square kilometre Gibraltar

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre, Early-demographic dividend or Gibraltar?
Gibraltar, at 1,240 units per square kilometre against 34.1 units per square kilometre in Early-demographic dividend as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre between Early-demographic dividend and Gibraltar?
1,206 units per square kilometre, with Gibraltar ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Early-demographic dividend and Gibraltar?
63 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2023.
How do Early-demographic dividend and Gibraltar rank globally for population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre?
Early-demographic dividend ranks 7th and Gibraltar ranks 5th of 45 groups.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Early-demographic dividend vs Gibraltar: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/gibraltar/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/early-demographic-dividend/gibraltar/">Early-demographic dividend vs Gibraltar: Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.