Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre

Belgium
122 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
14.8 units per square kilometre
in 2023
Belgium rank
29th
Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank
27th

Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre over time

  • Belgium
  • Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)
0255075100125196119922023

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 122 units per square kilometre against 14.8 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income), a difference of 107.2 units per square kilometre.

That makes Belgium's figure about 8.2 times Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)'s.

Across all 24 years both countries report, Belgium has been ahead every year.

Belgium ranks 29th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 27th of 215 countries.

Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) Difference Ahead
2000s 112.87 units per square kilometre 9.69 units per square kilometre 103.18 units per square kilometre Belgium
2010s 119.36 units per square kilometre 11.77 units per square kilometre 107.59 units per square kilometre Belgium
2020s 120.98 units per square kilometre 14.16 units per square kilometre 106.82 units per square kilometre Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre, Belgium or Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
Belgium, at 122 units per square kilometre against 14.8 units per square kilometre in Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) as of 2023.
What is the difference in population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre between Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
107.2 units per square kilometre, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income)?
24 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2023.
How do Belgium and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) rank globally for population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre?
Belgium ranks 29th and Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income) ranks 27th of 215 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre. Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 16 September 2026, from https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/belgium/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://health.statizoid.com/compare/population-ages-15-64-female-per-square-kilometre/belgium/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-high-income/">Belgium vs Sub-Saharan Africa (excluding high income): Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Population ages 15-64, female, per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
263 places, 15,281 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Population ages 15-64, female divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.